3/2019 - 12 | View TOC | « Previous Article | Next Article » |
Spatial Video Forgery Detection and Localization using Texture Analysis of Consecutive FramesSADDIQUE, M. , ASGHAR, K. , BAJWA, U. I. , HUSSAIN, M. , HABIB, Z. |
Extra paper information in |
Click to see author's profile in SCOPUS, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science |
Download PDF (1,374 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 1,682 | Views: 298 |
Author keywords
forensics, image classification, machine learning, multimedia systems
References keywords
detection(25), video(23), image(17), forgery(16), processing(15), multimedia(10), digital(10), signal(9), object(8), pattern(7)
Blue keywords are present in both the references section and the paper title.
About this article
Date of Publication: 2019-08-31
Volume 19, Issue 3, Year 2019, On page(s): 97 - 108
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2019.03012
Web of Science Accession Number: 000486574100012
SCOPUS ID: 85072162917
Abstract
Now-a-days, videos can be easily recorded and forged with user-friendly editing tools. These videos can be shared on social networks to make false propaganda. During the process of spatial forgery, the texture and micro-patterns of the frames become inconsistent, which can be observed in the difference of two consecutive frames. Based on this observation, a method has been proposed for detection of forged video segments and localization of forged frames. Employing the Chrominance value of Consecutive frame Difference (CCD) and Discriminative Robust Local Binary Pattern (DRLBP), a new descriptor is introduced to model the inconsistency embedded in the frames due to forgery. Support Vector Machine (SVM) is used to detect whether the pair of consecutive frames is forged. If at least one pair of consecutive frames is detected as forged, the video segment is predicted as forged and the forged frames are localized. Intensive experiments are performed to validate the performance of the method on a combined dataset of videos, which were tampered by copy-move and splicing methods. The detection accuracy on large dataset is 96.68 percent and video accuracy is 98.32 percent. The comparison shows that it outperforms the state-of-the-art methods, even through cross dataset validation. |
References | | | Cited By «-- Click to see who has cited this paper |
[1] C. Richao, Y. Gaobo, and Z. Ningbo, "Detection of object-based manipulation by the statistical features of object contour", Forensic science international, vol. 236, pp. 164-169, 2014, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 41] [SCOPUS Times Cited 52] [2] K. Asghar, Z. Habib, and M. Hussain, "Copy-move and splicing image forgery detection and localization techniques: a review", Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, pp. 1-27, 2016, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 69] [SCOPUS Times Cited 85] [3] R. C. Pandey, S. K. Singh, and K. K. Shukla, "Passive forensics in image and video using noise features: A review", Digital Investigation, vol. 19, pp. 1-28, 2016, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 35] [SCOPUS Times Cited 50] [4] R. D. Singh and N. Aggarwal, "Video content authentication techniques: a comprehensive survey", Multimedia Systems, pp. 1-30, 2017, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 61] [SCOPUS Times Cited 84] [5] K. Sitara and B. Mehtre, "Digital video tampering detection: An overview of passive techniques", Digital Investigation, vol. 18, pp. 8-22, 2016, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 87] [SCOPUS Times Cited 112] [6] A. Alahmadi, M. Hussain, H. Aboalsamh, G. Muhammad, G. Bebis, and H. Mathkour, "Passive detection of image forgery using DCT and local binary pattern", Signal, Image and Video Processing, vol. 11, pp. 81-88, 2017, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 74] [SCOPUS Times Cited 111] [7] B. Yang, X. Sun, H. Guo, Z. Xia, and X. Chen, "A copy-move forgery detection method based on CMFD-SIFT", Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 77, pp. 837-855, 2018, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 52] [SCOPUS Times Cited 86] [8] P. Aflaki, M. M. Hannuksela, and M. Gabbouj, "Subjective quality assessment of asymmetric stereoscopic 3D video", Signal, Image and Video Processing, vol. 9, pp. 331-345, 2015, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 26] [SCOPUS Times Cited 34] [9] A. Subramanyam and S. Emmanuel, "Video forgery detection using HOG features and compression properties", in Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), 2012 IEEE 14th International Workshop on, Banff Center Banff, AB, Canada, 2012, pp. 89-94, [CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 132] [10] Z. Guo, L. Zhang, and D. Zhang, "A completed modeling of local binary pattern operator for texture classification", IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 19, pp. 1657-1663, 2010, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 1505] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1927] [11] J. Ren, X. Jiang, and J. Yuan, "Noise-resistant local binary pattern with an embedded error-correction mechanism", IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 22, pp. 4049-4060, 2013, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 183] [SCOPUS Times Cited 214] [12] J. Zhang, K. Huang, Y. Yu, and T. Tan, "Boosted local structured hog-lbp for object localization", in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011 IEEE Conference on, 2011, pp. 1393-1400, [CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 141] [13] C.-C. Hsu, T.-Y. Hung, C.-W. Lin, and C.-T. Hsu, "Video forgery detection using correlation of noise residue", in Multimedia Signal Processing, 2008 IEEE 10th Workshop on, Queensland, Australia, 2008, pp. 170-174, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 114] [SCOPUS Times Cited 175] [14] G. Singh and K. Singh, "Video frame and region duplication forgery detection based on correlation coefficient and coefficient of variation", Multimedia Tools and Applications, pp. 1-36, 2018, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 33] [SCOPUS Times Cited 47] [15] L. Su, T. Huang, and J. Yang, "A video forgery detection algorithm based on compressive sensing", Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 74, pp. 1-16, 2014, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 30] [SCOPUS Times Cited 39] [16] S. Chen, S. Tan, B. Li, and J. Huang, "Automatic detection of object-based forgery in advanced video", IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 26, pp. 2138-2151, 2016, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 101] [SCOPUS Times Cited 123] [17] M. Kobayashi, T. Okabe, and Y. Sato, "Detecting video forgeries based on noise characteristics," in Advances in Image and Video Technology. vol. 5414, ed: Springer, 2009, pp. 306-317, [CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 52] [18] D.-K. Hyun, S.-J. Ryu, H.-Y. Lee, and H.-K. Lee, "Detection of upscale-crop and partial manipulation in surveillance video based on sensor pattern noise", Sensors, vol. 13, pp. 12605-12631, 2013, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 19] [SCOPUS Times Cited 28] [19] R. D. Singh and N. Aggarwal, "Detection of upscale-crop and splicing for digital video authentication", Digital Investigation, vol. 21, pp. 31-52, 2017, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 18] [SCOPUS Times Cited 26] [20] R. C. Pandey, S. K. Singh, and K. Shukla, "Passive copy-move forgery detection in videos", in Computer and Communication Technology (ICCCT), 2014 International Conference on, 2014, pp. 301-306, [CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 49] [21] J. Goodwin and G. Chetty, "Blind video tamper detection based on fusion of source features", in Digital Image Computing Techniques and Applications (DICTA), 2011 International Conference on, 2011, pp. 608-613, [CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 20] [22] A. Bidokhti and S. Ghaemmaghami, "Detection of regional copy/move forgery in MPEG videos using optical flow", in Artificial intelligence and signal processing (AISP), 2015 International symposium on, 2015, pp. 13-17, [CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 42] [23] C. Guo, G. Luo, and Y. Zhu, "A detection method for facial expression reenacted forgery in videos", in Tenth International Conference on Digital Image Processing (ICDIP 2018), 2018, p. 108061J, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 2] [SCOPUS Times Cited 4] [24] O. I. Al-Sanjary, A. A. Ahmed, A. A. B. Jaharadak, M. A. Ali, and H. M. Zangana, "Detection clone an object movement using an optical flow approach", in 2018 IEEE Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE), 2018, pp. 388-394, [CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 36] [25] L. Su and C. Li, "A novel passive forgery detection algorithm for video region duplication", Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 29, pp. 1173-1190, 2018, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 24] [SCOPUS Times Cited 29] [26] L. Li, X. Wang, W. Zhang, G. Yang, and G. Hu, "Detecting removed object from video with stationary background", in The International Workshop on Digital Forensics and Watermarking 2012, 2013, pp. 242-252, [CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 23] [27] V. Conotter, J. F. O'Brien, and H. Farid, "Exposing digital forgeries in ballistic motion", IEEE transactions on information forensics and security, vol. 7, pp. 283-296, 2012, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 43] [SCOPUS Times Cited 61] [28] M. Zampoglou, F. Markatopoulou, G. Mercier, D. Touska, E. Apostolidis, S. Papadopoulos, R. Cozien, I. Patras, V. Mezaris, and I. Kompatsiaris, "Detecting Tampered Videos with Multimedia Forensics and Deep Learning", in International Conference on Multimedia Modeling, 2019, pp. 374-386, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 17] [SCOPUS Times Cited 20] [29] Y. Yao, Y. Shi, S. Weng, and B. Guan, "Deep learning for detection of object-based forgery in advanced video", Symmetry, vol. 10, p. 3, 2017, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 46] [SCOPUS Times Cited 64] [30] A. Satpathy, X. Jiang, and H.-L. Eng, "LBP-based edge-texture features for object recognition", Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 23, pp. 1953-1964, 2014, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 182] [SCOPUS Times Cited 232] [31] G. Muhammad, M. H. Al-Hammadi, M. Hussain, and G. Bebis, "Image forgery detection using steerable pyramid transform and local binary pattern", Machine Vision and Applications, vol. 25, pp. 985-995, 2014, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 123] [SCOPUS Times Cited 178] [32] X. Zhao, S. Li, S. Wang, J. Li, and K. Yang, "Optimal chroma-like channel design for passive color image splicing detection", EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, vol. 2012, pp. 1-11, 2012, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 13] [SCOPUS Times Cited 25] [33] N. Dalal and B. Triggs, "Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection", in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005. IEEE Computer Society Conference on, 2005, pp. 886-893, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 23184] [SCOPUS Times Cited 29821] [34] C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, "Support-vector networks", Machine learning, vol. 20, pp. 273-297, 1995, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 35071] [35] J. Y. Hesterman, L. Caucci, M. A. Kupinski, H. H. Barrett, and L. R. Furenlid, "Maximum-likelihood estimation with a contracting-grid search algorithm", IEEE transactions on nuclear science, vol. 57, pp. 1077-1084, 2010, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 91] [SCOPUS Times Cited 107] [36] P. Bestagini, S. Milani, M. Tagliasacchi, and S. Tubaro, "Local tampering detection in video sequences", in Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), 2013 IEEE 15th International Workshop on, Pula (CA), Italy, 2013, pp. 488-493, [CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 132] [37] G. Qadir, S. Yahaya, and A. T. Ho, "Surrey university library for forensic analysis (SULFA) of video content", in Image Processing (IPR 2012), IET Conference on, London, UK, 2012, pp. 1-6, [CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 73] [38] E. Ardizzone and G. Mazzola, "A Tool to Support the Creation of Datasets of Tampered Videos," in Image Analysis and Processing-ICIAP 2015, ed: Springer, 2015, pp. 665-675., [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 15] [SCOPUS Times Cited 25] [39] G. Jin and X. Wan, "An improved method for SIFT-based copy-move forgery detection using non-maximum value suppression and optimized J-Linkage", Signal Processing: Image Communication, 2017, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 42] [SCOPUS Times Cited 60] [40] C.-M. Pun, X.-C. Yuan, and X.-L. Bi, "Image forgery detection using adaptive oversegmentation and feature point matching", IEEE transactions on information forensics and security, vol. 10, pp. 1705-1716, 2015, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 193] [SCOPUS Times Cited 267] [41] W. Wang and H. Farid, "Exposing digital forgeries in video by detecting duplication", in Proceedings of the 9th workshop on Multimedia & security, New York, USA, 2007, pp. 35-42, [CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 193] [42] L. Shiqi, T. Shengwei, Y. Long, Y. Jiong, and S. Hua, "Android malicious code Classification using Deep Belief Network", KSII Transactions on Internet & Information Systems, vol. 12, 2018, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 16] [SCOPUS Times Cited 30] [43] X. Liu, S. Lin, J. Fang, and Z. Xu, "Is extreme learning machine feasible? A theoretical assessment (Part I)", Neural Networks and Learning Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 26, pp. 7-20, 2015, [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 126] [SCOPUS Times Cited 145] [44] K. Weiss, T. M. Khoshgoftaar, and D. Wang, "A survey of transfer learning", Journal of Big Data, vol. 3, pp. 1-40, 2016, [CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 4038] Web of Science® Citations for all references: 61,636 TCR SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 39,192 TCR Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 1,370 ACR SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 871 ACR TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more Citations for references updated on 2024-11-14 17:13 in 304 seconds. Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics. Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site. |
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania
All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.
Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.
Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.