|4/2020 - 10|
A Strong Mutual Authentication Protocol for SHIELDOZCANHAN, M. H. , TURKSONMEZ, H.
|Click to see author's profile in SCOPUS, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science|
|Download PDF (1,509 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 111 | Views: 32|
access control, authentication, computer security, integrated circuits, radiofrequency identification
defense(11), supply(10), security(8), chain(8), rfid(7), systems(6), hardware(6), technology(5), office(5), counterfeit(5)
No common words between the references section and the paper title.
About this article
Date of Publication: 2020-11-30
Volume 20, Issue 4, Year 2020, On page(s): 81 - 90
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2020.04010
Web of Science Accession Number: 000594393400010
SCOPUS ID: 85098217840
Study shows that counterfeit semiconductors or Integrated Circuits (ICs) are increasingly penetrating into advanced electronic defense systems. Traditional supply chain management policies have been found unsuccessful in protecting the IC supply chain. Our study demonstrates that the newly started threat mitigation initiative of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's (DARPA) Supply Chain Hardware Integrity for Electronics Defense (SHIELD) scheme has not matured yet, and the proposed authentication protocol improvements are still vulnerable to known non-invasive, side-channel attacks. In present work, a novel authentication protocol based on strong mutual authentication is proposed, which resists the demonstrated attacks on previous schemes. The security and performance comparison with the previous work is provided, to inform the IC community about the seriousness of the weaknesses, in previous works. The comparison results show that our proposed protocol exchanges more information, uses more memory and makes more encryption computations. Thus, although our proposed scheme consumes more energy, it has the security required by SHIELD. The outcome forces IC producers to provide enough memory and processing power in a small die area, if the electronic defense IC supply chain is to have the expected security.
|References|||||Cited By «-- Click to see who has cited this paper|
| C. Jin, M. van Dijk, "Secure and efficient initialization and authentication protocols for SHIELD," IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, vol. 16, p. 156-173, 2019. |
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 3] [SCOPUS Times Cited 5]
 U.S. Defense Science Board Task Force on High Performance Microchip Supply, "Defense science board task force on high performance microchip supply," Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, 2005.
 G. Sumathi, L. Srivani, D. T. Murthy, A. Kumar, K. Madhusoodanan, "Hardware obfuscation using different obfuscation cell structures for PLDs," in A Systems Approach to Cyber Security: Proceedings of the 2nd Singapore Cyber-Security R&D Conference (SG-CRC 2017), Singapore, Feb. 21-22, 2017, pp. 143-157.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 1] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1]
 S. Leef, "Supply chain hardware integrity for electronics defense (SHIELD)," Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Microsystems Technology Office, 2018.
 U. Guin, K. Huang, D. DiMase, M. Tehranipoor, Y. Makris, "Counterfeit integrated circuits: A rising threat in the global semiconductor supply chain," in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 102, no. 8, pp. 1207-1228, Aug. 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 158] [SCOPUS Times Cited 210]
 U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security Office of Technology Evaluation, "Defense industrial base assessment: counterfeit electronics," Jan. 2010.
 U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services 112th Congress, "Inquiry into counterfeit electronic parts in the department of defense supply chain," May 2012.
 S. Skorobogatov, "Hardware assurance and its importance to national security," May 2012.
 M. J. Blair, "Proactive defense for evolving supply chain counterfeiting," Air Command and Staff College, Air University, Maxwell AFB, USA, Rep. AU/ACSC/2015, Dec. 2015.
 S. Leef, "Supply chain hardware integrity for electronics defense," Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Microsystems Technology Office, 2019.
 M. Rostami, K. Farinaz, R. Karri, "A primer on hardware security: Models, methods, and metrics," in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 102, no. 8, pp. 1283-1295, Aug. 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 215] [SCOPUS Times Cited 289]
 Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), "Tiny, cheap, foolproof: seeking new component to counter counterfeit electronics," Microsystems Technology Office (MTO) Broad Agency Announcement, 2014.
 K. Yang, D. Forte, M. M. Tehranipoor, "CDTA: A comprehensive solution for counterfeit detection, traceability, and authentication in the IoT supply chain," ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES), vol. 22, no. 3, May 2017.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 8] [SCOPUS Times Cited 13]
 F. Koushanfar, R. Karri, "Can the SHIELD protect our integrated circuits?," IEEE 57th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS), Aug. 2014.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 6]
 G. Dalkilic, M.H. Ozcanhan, H. S. Cakir, "Increasing key space at little extra cost in RFID authentications," Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, Dec. 2013.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 2] [SCOPUS Times Cited 3]
 M. Rostami, M. Majzoobi, F. Koushanfar, D.S. Wallach, S. Devadas, "Robust and reverse-engineering resilient PUF authentication and key-exchange by substring matching," IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 37-49, Mar. 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 64] [SCOPUS Times Cited 87]
 U. Ruhrmair, D. Srinivas, F. Koushanfar, "Security based on physical unclonability and disorder," Introduction to Hardware Security and Trust, pp. 65-102, USA, Springer, 2012.
 M. H. Ozcanhan, G. Dalkilic, S. Utku, "Cryptographically supported NFC tags in medication for better inpatient safety," Journal of Medical Systems, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1-15, Aug. 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 9] [SCOPUS Times Cited 7]
 Y. C. Yen, N. W. Lo, T. C. Wu, "Two RFID-based solutions for secure inpatient medication administration," Journal of Medical Systems, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 2769-2778, Oct. 2012.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 38] [SCOPUS Times Cited 42]
 P. Peris-Lopez, A. Orfila, A. Mitrokotsa, J.C.A. Van der Lubbe, "A comprehensive RFID solution to enhance inpatient medication safety," Int. Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 13-24, Jan. 2011.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 84] [SCOPUS Times Cited 98]
 M. H. Ozcanhan, S. Baytar, S. Utku, G. Dalkilic, "security issues of a recent rfid multi tagging protocol," International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 11-15, Jan. 2015.
 P. Peris-Lopez, A. Orfila, J. C. H. Castro, J. C. A. Lubbe, "Flaws on RFID grouping-proofs. Guidelines for future sound protocols," Journal of Network and Computer Applications", vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 833-845, May 2011.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 52] [SCOPUS Times Cited 76]
 M. H. Ozcanhan, "Improvement of a weak RFID authentication protocol making drug administration insecure," Life Science Journal, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 269-276, Jan. 2014.
 K. Yang, D. Forte, M. M. Tehranipoor, "Protecting endpoint devices in IoT supply chain," presented at the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD), Austin, TX, USA, Nov. 2-6, 2015.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 31]
 K. Yang, D. Forte, M. M. Tehranipoor, "ReSC: An RFID-enabled solution for defending IoT supply chain," ACM Trans. Design Automation of Electronic Systems, vol. 23, no. 3, Apr. 2018.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 3] [SCOPUS Times Cited 7]
 D. S. Jeong, R. Thomas, R. Katiyar, J. Scott, H. Kohlstedt, A. Petraru, C. S. Hwang, "Emerging memories: resistive switching mechanisms and current status," Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 75, no. 7.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 620] [SCOPUS Times Cited 660]
Web of Science® Citations for all references: 1,257 TCR
SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 1,535 TCR
Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 47 ACR
SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 57 ACR
TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference
We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more
Citations for references updated on 2021-03-01 02:03 in 99 seconds.
Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics.
Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site.
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania
All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.
Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.
Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.