Click to open the HelpDesk interface
AECE - Front page banner

Menu:


FACTS & FIGURES

JCR Impact Factor: 1.102
JCR 5-Year IF: 0.734
Issues per year: 4
Current issue: Nov 2020
Next issue: Feb 2021
Avg review time: 56 days


PUBLISHER

Stefan cel Mare
University of Suceava
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and
Computer Science
13, Universitatii Street
Suceava - 720229
ROMANIA

Print ISSN: 1582-7445
Online ISSN: 1844-7600
WorldCat: 643243560
doi: 10.4316/AECE


TRAFFIC STATS

2,742,689 unique visits
695,957 downloads
Since November 1, 2009



Robots online now
Googlebot


SJR SCImago RANK

SCImago Journal & Country Rank




TEXT LINKS

Anycast DNS Hosting
MOST RECENT ISSUES

 Volume 20 (2020)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2020
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2020
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2020
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2020
 
 
 Volume 19 (2019)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2019
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2019
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2019
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2019
 
 
 Volume 18 (2018)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2018
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2018
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2018
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2018
 
 
 Volume 17 (2017)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2017
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2017
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2017
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2017
 
 
 Volume 16 (2016)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2016
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2016
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2016
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2016
 
 
  View all issues  


FEATURED ARTICLE

Improved Wind Speed Prediction Using Empirical Mode Decomposition, ZHANG, Y., ZHANG, C., SUN, J., GUO, J.
Issue 2/2018

AbstractPlus


SAMPLE ARTICLES

Improvements on the Incremental Conductance MPPT Method Applied to a PV String with Single-Phase to Three-Phase Converter for Rural Grid Applications, MONTEIRO, L. F. C., FREITAS, C. M., BELLAR, M. D.
Issue 1/2019

AbstractPlus

Optimal Transceiver Design for SWIPT in Interference Alignment Network, CHEN, Y., LIU, C., FU, Y., SONG, Y., QIAN, M.
Issue 2/2020

AbstractPlus

Dynamic Heart Rate Measurements from Video Sequences using Canonical Component Analysis, LING, S.-S., PARAMESRAN, R., YU, Y.-P.
Issue 3/2019

AbstractPlus

Quantitative Performance Comparison and Optimization of Novel Complementary Field Excited Linear Flux Switching Machine, ULLAH, N., BASIT, A., KHAN, F., ALI, F., ALI, H., AHMED, R., HASEEB, I., KAZMI, M. A.
Issue 4/2019

AbstractPlus

Reassigned Short Time Fourier Transform and K-means Method for Diagnosis of Broken Rotor Bar Detection in VSD-fed Induction Motors, OJEDA-AGUIRRE, N. A., GARCIA-PEREZ, A., ROMERO-TRONCOSO, R. J., MORINIGO-SOTELO, D., DUQUE-PEREZ, O., CAMARENA-MARTINEZ, D.
Issue 2/2019

AbstractPlus

Analysis of Steady-State Error in Torque Current Component Control of PMSM Drive, BRANDSTETTER, P., NEBORAK, I., KUCHAR, M.
Issue 2/2017

AbstractPlus




LATEST NEWS

2020-Jun-29
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2019. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 1.102 (1.023 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.734.

2020-Jun-11
Starting on the 15th of June 2020 we wiil introduce a new policy for reviewers. Reviewers who provide timely and substantial comments will receive a discount voucher entitling them to an APC reduction. Vouchers (worth of 25 EUR or 50 EUR, depending on the review quality) will be assigned to reviewers after the final decision of the reviewed paper is given. Vouchers issued to specific individuals are not transferable.

2019-Dec-16
Starting on the 15th of December 2019 all paper authors are required to enter their SCOPUS IDs. You may use the free SCOPUS ID lookup form to find yours in case you don't remember it.

2019-Jun-20
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2018. The JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.650, and the JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.639.

2018-May-31
Starting today, the minimum number a pages for a paper is 8, so all submitted papers should have 8, 10 or 12 pages. No exceptions will be accepted.

Read More »


    
 

  3/2019 - 8

A Fuzzy AHP Approach for Security Risk Assessment in SCADA Networks

MARKOVIC-PETROVIC, J. D. See more information about MARKOVIC-PETROVIC, J. D. on SCOPUS See more information about MARKOVIC-PETROVIC, J. D. on IEEExplore See more information about MARKOVIC-PETROVIC, J. D. on Web of Science, STOJANOVIC, M. D. See more information about   STOJANOVIC, M. D. on SCOPUS See more information about   STOJANOVIC, M. D. on SCOPUS See more information about STOJANOVIC, M. D. on Web of Science, BOSTJANCIC RAKAS, S. V. See more information about BOSTJANCIC RAKAS, S. V. on SCOPUS See more information about BOSTJANCIC RAKAS, S. V. on SCOPUS See more information about BOSTJANCIC RAKAS, S. V. on Web of Science
 
Click to see author's profile in See more information about the author on SCOPUS SCOPUS, See more information about the author on IEEE Xplore IEEE Xplore, See more information about the author on Web of Science Web of Science

Download PDF pdficon (280 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 312 | Views: 870

Author keywords
decision making, fuzzy logic, information security, risk analysis, SCADA systems

References keywords
security(15), systems(9), scada(9), risk(8), cyber(8), assessment(7), control(5), industrial(4), fuzzy(4)
Blue keywords are present in both the references section and the paper title.

About this article
Date of Publication: 2019-08-31
Volume 19, Issue 3, Year 2019, On page(s): 69 - 74
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2019.03008
Web of Science Accession Number: 000486574100008
SCOPUS ID: 85072203058

Abstract
Quick view
Full text preview
In this paper we propose a new method for security risk assessment in Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) networks. The method consists of the three phases, namely the objective phase, the subjective phase and the final assessment phase. The objective phase deals with the analysis of SCADA historical data. The subjective phase takes into account the experience of relevant experts. The final assessment phase takes into account outputs from both the objective and subjective phases. Fuzzy logic has been applied in all three phases, while analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been used in subjective phase, due to its suitability to evaluate the experts' competency. The method is evaluated on a case study regarding the real run-off-river hydropower plant. Evaluation results have clearly indicated benefits of the proposed method in comparison with the purely objective approach, in terms of more precise risk assessment and higher return on security investment.


References | Cited By  «-- Click to see who has cited this paper

[1] M. Stojanovic, S. Bostjancic Rakas, J. Markovic-Petrovic, "Cloud-based SCADA systems: Cyber security considerations and future challenges," invited paper, in Proc. 4th Virtual Int. Conf. Science, Technology and Management in Energy, pp. 253-260, October 2018. [Online] Available: Temporary on-line reference link removed - see the PDF document

[2] B. Zhu, A. Joseph, S. Sastry, "A taxonomy of cyber attacks on SCADA systems," in Proc. 2011 International Conference on the Internet of Things and the 4th International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, 2011, pp. 380-388.
[CrossRef]


[3] A. Nicholson, S. Webber, S. Dyer, T. Patel, H. Janicke, "SCADA security in the light of cyber-warfare," Computers & Security, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 418-436, Jun. 2012.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 136]


[4] D. Ding, Q.-L. Han, Y. Xiang, X. Ge, X.-M. Zhang, "A survey on security control and attack detection for industrial cyber-physical systems," Neurocomputing, vol. 275, pp. 1674-1683, Jan. 2018.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 200]


[5] C. Queiroz, A. Mahmood, J. Hu, Z. Tari, X. Yu, "Building a SCADA security testbed," in Proc. 2009 Third International Conference on Network and System Security, IEEE, 2009, pp. 357-364.
[CrossRef]


[6] J. Markovic-Petrovic, M. Stojanovic, "Analysis of SCADA system vulnerabilities to DDoS attacks," in Proc. 2013 11th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services (TELSIKS), 2013, vol. 02, pp. 591-594.
[CrossRef]


[7] S. Asri, B. Pranggono, "Impact of distributed denial-of-service attack on advanced metering infrastructure," Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 2211-2223, Aug. 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 20]


[8] J. Gao et al., "SCADA communication and security issues," Security and Communication Networks, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 175-194, Jan. 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 35]


[9] R. S. Ross, "Guide for conducting risk assessments," National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-30 Rev. 1, Sep. 2012.

[10] J. D. Markovic-Petrovic, M. D. Stojanovic, "An improved risk assessment method for SCADA information security," Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 69-72, Sep. 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 6]


[11] Y. Cherdantseva et al., "A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems," Computers & Security, vol. 56, pp.1-27, Feb. 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 150]


[12] P. A. S. Ralston, J. H. Graham, J. L. Hieb, "Cyber security risk assessment for SCADA and DCS networks," ISA Transactions, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 583-594, Oct. 2007.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 114]


[13] J. Yan, M. Govindarasu, C. Liu, U. Vaidya, "A PMU-based risk assessment framework for power control systems," in Proc. 2013 IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting, 2013, pp. 1-5.
[CrossRef]


[14] M. Gul, A. F. Guneri, "A fuzzy multi criteria risk assessment based on decision matrix technique: A case study for aluminum industry," Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 40, pp. 89-100, Mar. 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 70]


[15] Q. Zhang, C. Zhou, Y. Tian, N. Xiong, Y. Qin, B. Hu, "A fuzzy probability Bayesian network approach for dynamic cybersecurity risk assessment in industrial control systems," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 2497-2506, Jun. 2018.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 17]


[16] Y. Duan, Y. Cai, Z. Wang, X. Deng, "A novel network security risk assessment approach by combining subjective and objective weights under uncertainty," Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 428, Mar. 2018.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 11]


[17] T. L. Saaty, "Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Services Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83-98, Jan. 2008.
[CrossRef]


[18] W. Sonnenreich, J. Albanese, B. Stout, "Return on security investment (ROSI) a practical quantitative model," in Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Security in Information Systems - Volume 1, WOSIS, 2005, pp. 239-252.
[CrossRef]


[19] K. Scarfone, P. Mell, "Guide to Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS) | NIST," Special Publication (NIST SP) - 800-94, Feb. 2007.

[20] H. Zhang, D. Liu, Fuzzy Modeling and Fuzzy Control, Birkhäuser Basel, pp. 139-145, 2006.
[CrossRef]


[21] B. Galloway, G. Hancke, "Introduction to industrial control networks," IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 860-880, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 190]


[22] R. Mitchell, I.-R. Chen, "A survey of intrusion detection techniques for cyber physical systems," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 55:1-55:29, Mar. 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 226]




References Weight

Web of Science® Citations for all references: 1,175 TCR
SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 0

Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 51 ACR
SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 0

TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference

We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more

Citations for references updated on 2021-01-17 09:33 in 113 seconds.




Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics.
Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site.

Copyright ©2001-2021
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania


All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.

Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.

Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.




Website loading speed and performance optimization powered by: