|1/2018 - 16|
|Click to see author's profile in SCOPUS, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science|
|Download PDF (1,083 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 695 | Views: 2,798|
computer vision, human computer interaction, pervasive computing, reviews, statistical analysis
kinect(24), microsoft(10), validity(7), sensors(7), sensor(7), gait(7), recognition(6), measurement(6), posture(5), motion(5)
Blue keywords are present in both the references section and the paper title.
About this article
Date of Publication: 2018-02-28
Volume 18, Issue 1, Year 2018, On page(s): 131 - 136
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2018.01016
Web of Science Accession Number: 000426449500016
SCOPUS ID: 85043275331
Kinect sensors are Human Computer Interaction devices oriented to entertainment, but have rapidly spread to several fields such as health care, physical therapy, and training. Their multiple advantages place them at present in a competitive situation compared to traditional solutions. On the other hand, their accuracy and precision for sensitive human applications are still under critical examination. This paper presents a brief literature review on the validity and reliability of the first and the second generation Kinect sensors to get an idea of the feasibility of their propagation as measuring devices in functional assessment applications. Results are difficult to compare because they depend largely on the type of measured elements, the angle of view of the measurement, the distance to the sensor, and even the diversity of human motion features. Nonetheless, they suggest that Kinect sensors are capable of properly identifying posture and motion, but not body or joint rotations, unusual postures, or occlusions.
|References|||||Cited By «-- Click to see who has cited this paper|
| D. Regazzoni, G. De Vecchi, and C. Rizzi, "RGB cams vs RGB-D sensors?: Low cost motion capture technologies performances and limitations," Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 719728, 2014. |
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 21]
 B. Bonnechère et al., "Validity and reliability of the Kinect within functional assessment activities: Comparison with standard stereophotogrammetry," Gait and Posture, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 593598, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 156]
 P. Plantard et al., "Pose Estimation with a Kinect for Ergonomic Studies: Evaluation of the Accuracy Using a Virtual Mannequin," Sensors, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 17851803, Jan. 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 44]
 O. Geman and H. Costin, "Automatic Assessing of Tremor Severity Using Nonlinear Dynamics, Artificial Neural Networks and Neuro-Fuzzy Classifier," Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 133138, Feb. 2014.
[CrossRef] [Full Text] [Web of Science Times Cited 20]
 B. Müller et al., "Validation of enhanced kinect sensor based motion capturing for gait assessment," PLOS ONE, vol. 12, no. 4, p. e0175813, Apr. 2017.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 47]
 G. Blumrosen et al., "A Real-Time Kinect Signature-Based Patient Home Monitoring System," Sensors, vol. 16, no. 11, p. 1965, Nov. 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 21]
 Z. Ren et al., "Robust part-based hand gesture recognition using kinect sensor," IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 11101120, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 374]
 R. a Clark et al., "Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control.," Gait & posture, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 3727, Jul. 2012.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 372]
 S. Obdrzalek et al., "Accuracy and robustness of Kinect pose estimation in the context of coaching of elderly population," in 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2012, pp. 11881193.
 L. Chen, H. Wei, and J. Ferryman, "A survey of human motion analysis using depth imagery," Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 34, no. 15, pp. 19952006, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 195]
 R. Lun and W. Zhao, "A Survey of Applications and Human Motion Recognition with Microsoft Kinect," International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 29, no. 5, p. 1555008, Aug. 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 108]
 T. Mallick, P. P. Das, and A. K. Majumdar, "Characterizations of Noise in Kinect Depth Images: A Review," IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 17311740, Jun. 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 69]
 P. K. Pisharady and M. Saerbeck, "Recent methods and databases in vision-based hand gesture recognition: A review," Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 141, pp. 152165, Dec. 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 100]
 T. D'Orazio et al., "Recent trends in gesture recognition: how depth data has improved classical approaches," Image and Vision Computing, vol. 52, pp. 5672, Aug. 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 23]
 D. Webster and O. Celik, "Systematic review of Kinect applications in elderly care and stroke rehabilitation," Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, vol. 11, p. 108, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 187]
 J. Han et al., "Enhanced computer vision with Microsoft Kinect sensor: A review," IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 13181334, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 664]
 T. Breuer, C. Bodensteiner, and M. Arens, "Low-cost commodity depth sensor comparison and accuracy analysis," in Electro-Optical Remote Sensing, Photonic Technologies, and Applications, 2014, vol. 9250, p. 92500G.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 15]
 R. A. Clark et al., "Concurrent validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of spatiotemporal gait variables," Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 46, no. 15, pp. 27222725, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 120]
 A. Schmitz et al., "Accuracy and repeatability of joint angles measured using a single camera markerless motion capture system," Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 587591, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 71]
 B. Galna et al., "Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect sensor for measuring movement in people with Parkinson's disease," Gait & posture, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 10628, Apr. 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 275]
 Y. Yang et al., "Reliability and Validity of Kinect RGB-D Sensor for Assessing Standing Balance," IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 16331638, May 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 49]
 R. A. Clark et al., "Reliability and concurrent validity of the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect for assessment of standing balance and postural control," Gait and Posture, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 210213, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 82]
 M. E. Huber et al., "Validity and reliability of Kinect skeleton for measuring shoulder joint angles: A feasibility study," Physiotherapy (United Kingdom), vol. 101, no. 4, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 54]
 X. Xu and R. W. McGorry, "The validity of the first and second generation Microsoft Kinect for identifying joint center locations during static postures," Applied Ergonomics, vol. 49, pp. 4754, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 65]
 J. Darby et al., "An evaluation of 3D head pose estimation using the Microsoft Kinect v2," Gait & Posture, vol. 48, pp. 8388, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 16]
 H. Gonzalez-Jorge et al., "Metrological evaluation of Microsoft Kinect and Asus Xtion sensors," Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 18001806, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 90]
 M. Bueno et al., "Metrological evaluation of Kinect Fusion and its comparison with Microsoft Kinect sensor," Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, vol. 73, pp. 137145, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 17]
 H. Gonzalez-Jorge et al., "Metrological comparison between Kinect i and Kinect II sensors," Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, vol. 70, pp. 2126, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 71]
 A. Corti et al., "A metrological characterization of the Kinect V2 time-of-flight camera," Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 75, pp. 584594, Jan. 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 63]
Web of Science® Citations for all references: 3,389 TCR
SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 0
Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 113 ACR
SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 0
TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference
We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more
Citations for references updated on 2021-02-27 12:29 in 185 seconds.
Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics.
Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site.
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania
All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.
Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.
Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.