Click to open the HelpDesk interface
AECE - Front page banner

Menu:


FACTS & FIGURES

JCR Impact Factor: 0.800
JCR 5-Year IF: 1.000
SCOPUS CiteScore: 2.0
Issues per year: 4
Current issue: Feb 2024
Next issue: May 2024
Avg review time: 75 days
Avg accept to publ: 48 days
APC: 300 EUR


PUBLISHER

Stefan cel Mare
University of Suceava
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and
Computer Science
13, Universitatii Street
Suceava - 720229
ROMANIA

Print ISSN: 1582-7445
Online ISSN: 1844-7600
WorldCat: 643243560
doi: 10.4316/AECE


TRAFFIC STATS

2,528,963 unique visits
1,005,520 downloads
Since November 1, 2009



Robots online now
bingbot
Googlebot
SemanticScholar


SCOPUS CiteScore

SCOPUS CiteScore


SJR SCImago RANK

SCImago Journal & Country Rank




TEXT LINKS

Anycast DNS Hosting
MOST RECENT ISSUES

 Volume 24 (2024)
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2024
 
 
 Volume 23 (2023)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2023
 
 
 Volume 22 (2022)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2022
 
 
 Volume 21 (2021)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2021
 
 
  View all issues  


FEATURED ARTICLE

Application of the Voltage Control Technique and MPPT of Stand-alone PV System with Storage, HIVZIEFENDIC, J., VUIC, L., LALE, S., SARIC, M.
Issue 1/2022

AbstractPlus






LATEST NEWS

2023-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2022. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.800 (0.700 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 1.000.

2023-Jun-05
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2022, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2019-2022 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2022 is 2.0. For "General Computer Science" we rank #134/233 and for "Electrical and Electronic Engineering" we rank #478/738.

2022-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2021. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.825 (0.722 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.752.

2022-Jun-16
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2021, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2018-2021 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2021 is 2.5, the same as for 2020 but better than all our previous results.

2021-Jun-30
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2020. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 1.221 (1.053 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.961.

Read More »


    
 

  4/2017 - 5

Fault Localization for Synchrophasor Data using Kernel Principal Component Analysis

CHEN, R. See more information about CHEN, R. on SCOPUS See more information about CHEN, R. on IEEExplore See more information about CHEN, R. on Web of Science, SUN, X. See more information about  SUN, X. on SCOPUS See more information about  SUN, X. on SCOPUS See more information about SUN, X. on Web of Science, LIU, G. See more information about LIU, G. on SCOPUS See more information about LIU, G. on SCOPUS See more information about LIU, G. on Web of Science
 
View the paper record and citations in View the paper record and citations in Google Scholar
Click to see author's profile in See more information about the author on SCOPUS SCOPUS, See more information about the author on IEEE Xplore IEEE Xplore, See more information about the author on Web of Science Web of Science

Download PDF pdficon (1,213 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 905 | Views: 2,343

Author keywords
power systems, fault location, phasor measurement units, kernel, principal component analysis

References keywords
power(17), systems(10), analysis(10), detection(9), system(7), component(7), fault(6), principal(5), kernel(4), components(4)
Blue keywords are present in both the references section and the paper title.

About this article
Date of Publication: 2017-11-30
Volume 17, Issue 4, Year 2017, On page(s): 37 - 42
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2017.04005
Web of Science Accession Number: 000417674300005
SCOPUS ID: 85035786014

Abstract
Quick view
Full text preview
In this paper, based on Kernel Principal Component Analysis (KPCA) of Phasor Measurement Units (PMU) data, a nonlinear method is proposed for fault location in complex power systems. Resorting to the scaling factor, the derivative for a polynomial kernel is obtained. Then, the contribution of each variable to the T2 statistic is derived to determine whether a bus is the fault component. Compared to the previous Principal Component Analysis (PCA) based methods, the novel version can combat the characteristic of strong nonlinearity, and provide the precise identification of fault location. Computer simulations are conducted to demonstrate the improved performance in recognizing the fault component and evaluating its propagation across the system based on the proposed method.


References | Cited By  «-- Click to see who has cited this paper

[1] X. Liu, D. M. Laverty, R. J. Best, K. Li, D. J. Morrow, S. McLoone, "Principal component analysis of wide-area phasor measurements for islanding detection - a geometric view," IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 976-985, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 81] [SCOPUS Times Cited 92]


[2] W. J. Liu, Z. Z. Lin, F. S. Wen, G. Ledwich, "A wide area monitoring system based load restoration method," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 2025-2034, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 57] [SCOPUS Times Cited 77]


[3] Z. Zhao, C. Wang, Y. G. Zhang, Y. Sun, "Latest progress of fault detection and localization in complex electrical engineering," Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 55-59, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 8]


[4] D. Novosel, K. Vu, V. Centeno, S. Skok, M. Begovic, "Benefits of synchronized-measurement technology for power-grid applications", in Proc. 4th Annu. Hawaii Int. Conf. System Sciences, Hawaii, 2007, pp. 118-118.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 31]


[5] M. Rarrerty, X. Liu, D. Laverty, S. McLoone, "Real-time multiple event detection and classification using moving window pca," IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 2537-2548, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 108] [SCOPUS Times Cited 132]


[6] S. Abraham, H. Dhaliwal, R. J. Efford, L. J. Keen, A. McLellan, J. Manley, K. Vollman, N. J. Diaz, T. Ridge et al., Final report on the August 14, 2003 blackout in the United states and Canada: causes and recommendations. US-Canada Power System Outage Task Force, 2004

[7] Y. Wang, W. Y. Li, J. P. Lu, "Reliability analysis of phasor measurement unit using hierarchical markov modeling," Electric Power Components and Systems, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 517-532, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 45] [SCOPUS Times Cited 58]


[8] R. Sodhi, S. C. Srivastava, S. N. Singh, "Phasor-assisted hybrid state estimator," Electric Power Components and Systems, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 533-544, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 25] [SCOPUS Times Cited 31]


[9] R. Sodhi, S. C. Srivastava, S. N. Singh, "Optimal pmu placement method for complete topological and numerical observability of power system," Electric Power Components and Systems, vol. 80, no. 9, pp. 1154-1159, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 73] [SCOPUS Times Cited 101]


[10] C. H. Peng, H. J. Sun and J. F. Guo, "Multi-objective optimal pmu placement using a non-dominated sorting differential evolution algorithm," International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 886-892, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 101] [SCOPUS Times Cited 136]


[11] Arturo. R. Messina, N. I.. Moreno, J. J. Nuno, "Monitoring the health of large interconnected power systems: a near real-time perspective," in Proc. 8th Annu. IFAC Symposium on Fault Detection, Supervision and Safety of Tehnical Processes(SAFEPROCESS), Mexico, 2012, pp. 2-12.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 4]


[12] Y. G. Zhang, Z. P. Wang, J. F. Zhang, "A novel fault identification using WAMS/PMU," Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 21-26, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Full Text] [Web of Science Times Cited 10] [SCOPUS Times Cited 11]


[13] E. Barocio, B. C. Pal, D. Fabozzi, N. F. Thornhill, "Detection and visualization of power system disturbances using principal component analysis," in Proc. IREP, 2013, pp. 1-10.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 36]


[14] X. Liu, J. M. Kennedy, D. M. Laverty, D. John Morrow, Sean McLoone, "Wide area phase angle measurements for islanding detection - an adaptive nonlinear approach", IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1901-1911, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 32] [SCOPUS Times Cited 37]


[15] Le. Xie, Yang. Chen, P. R. Kumar, "Dimensionality reduction of synchrophasor data for early event detection: linearized analysis," IEEE Transactions on Power System, vol. 29, no. 6, pp.2784-2794, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 172] [SCOPUS Times Cited 214]


[16] M. Ariff, B. C. Pal, "Coherency identification in interconnected power systems - an independent component analysis approach", IEEE Transactions on Power System, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1747-1755, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 120] [SCOPUS Times Cited 144]


[17] Ali. Ajami, Mahdi. Daneshvar, "Data driven approach for fault detection and diagnosis of turbine in thermal power plant using independent component analysis," Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 43, no. 1, pp.728-735, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 84] [SCOPUS Times Cited 117]


[18] Jong. Min. Lee, Chang. Kyoo, Yoo, Sang. Wook Choi, Peter. A. Vanrolleghem, In. Beum. Lee, "Nonlinear process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis", Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 223-234, 2004.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 808] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1062]


[19] Shujie. Hou, Robert. Caiming. Qiu, "Kernel feature template matching for spectrum sensing," IEEE Transactions on Vehicular technology, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 2258-2271, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 20] [SCOPUS Times Cited 23]


[20] Bernhard Schölkopf, Alexander Smola, Klaus-Robert Müller, "Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem," Neural Computation, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1299-1319, 1998.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 5208] [SCOPUS Times Cited 6622]


[21] A. Rakotomamonjy, "Variable selection using svm based criteria," Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1357-1370, 2003

[22] F. Jia, E. B. Martin, A. J. Morris, "Non-linear principal components analysis with application to process fault detection," International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1473-1487, 2001.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 61] [SCOPUS Times Cited 83]


[23] J. H. Hu,S. S. Xie,G. Q. Luo,Yang Fan,J. B. Peng, "Fault identification method of kernel principal component analysis based on contribution plots and its application," Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 572-576, 2008



References Weight

Web of Science® Citations for all references: 7,013 TCR
SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 9,011 TCR

Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 292 ACR
SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 375 ACR

TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference

We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more

Citations for references updated on 2024-04-12 16:16 in 117 seconds.




Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics.
Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site.

Copyright ©2001-2024
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania


All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.

Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.

Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.




Website loading speed and performance optimization powered by: 


DNS Made Easy