|3/2011 - 6|
A Combined Feedback and Noise Cancellation Algorithm for Binaural Hearing AidsLEE, H.-W. , JEON, M.-Y.
|Click to see author's profile on SCOPUS, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science|
|Download PDF (726 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 804 | Views: 3,233|
hearing aids, feedback, noise reduction, acoustic beam, microphone array
hearing(14), aids(14), feedback(12), processing(7), cancellation(7), adaptive(7), speech(5), signal(5), audio(4), acoustic(4)
Blue keywords are present in both the references section and the paper title.
About this article
Date of Publication: 2011-08-31
Volume 11, Issue 3, Year 2011, On page(s): 35 - 40
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2011.03006
Web of Science Accession Number: 000296186700006
SCOPUS ID: 80055079154
This paper proposes an adaptive algorithm for the combined acoustic feedback and noise cancellation in the binaural hearing aids. The proposed algorithm is based on dual microphones for feedback cancellation and the beamforming method for noise cancellation. The coefficients of feedback canceller are updated after subtracting the speech signal from the input signal by dual microphones. And the noise canceller reduces the noise signal in the residual signal excluding the speech by the beamforming method. Firstly, the feedback canceller operates to cancel the feedback signal in the microphone signal, and then the noise canceller operates to reduce the noise in the residual signal. Also, to assure the stable convergence of binaural hearing aids in the training mode, the coefficients of the left hearing aid are firstly updated, then the coefficients of the right hearing aid are updated. In the normal mode, the feedback and the noise canceller are operated without updating coefficients except an unstable case. To verify performances of the proposed algorithm, we analyzed its convergence behavior and simulated for real speech. From the results of simulations, it was proved that we can advance 14.43dB SFR(speech-to-feedback ratio) on average in the feedback canceller, 10.19dB SNR(speech-to-noise ratio) improvement on average in the noise canceller, in the case of applying the proposed algorithm.
|References|||||Cited By «-- Click to see who has cited this paper|
| D. K. Bustamante, T. L. Worrall, M. J. Williamson, "Measurement and adaptive suppression of acoustic feedback in hearing aids", Proc. ICASSP-89, pp.2017-2020, April 1989. |
 J. M. Kates, "Feedback cancellation in hearing aids : results from a computer simulation", IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, Vol.39, No.3, pp.553-562, March 1991.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 64] [SCOPUS Times Cited 74]
 J. A. Maxwell, P. M. Zurek, "Reducing acoustic feedback in hearing aids", IEEE Trans., Speech Audio Processing, Vol.3, No.4, pp.304-313, July 1995.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 78] [SCOPUS Times Cited 102]
 J. E. Greenberg, P. M. Zurek, and M. Brantley, "Evaluation of feedback-reduction algorithms for hearing aids", J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., Vol.108, No.5, pp.2366-2376, November 2000.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Web of Science Times Cited 37] [SCOPUS Times Cited 46]
 S. Laugesen, K. V. Hansen, and J. Hellgren, "Acceptable delay in hearing aids and implications for feedback cancellation", J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., Vol.105, No.2, pp.1211-1212, 1999.
 J. Hellgren, U. Forssell, "Bias of feedback cancellation algorithm in hearing aids based on direct closed loop identification", IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Processing, Vol.9, No.8, pp.906-913, November 2001.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 45] [SCOPUS Times Cited 55]
 J. M. Kates, "Constrained adaptation for feedback cancellation in hearing aids", J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., Vol.106, No.2, pp.1010-1019, August 1999.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Web of Science Times Cited 52] [SCOPUS Times Cited 54]
 A. Spriet, I. Proudler, M. Moonen, and J. Wouters, "Adaptive feedback cancellation in hearing aids with linear prediction of the desired signal", IEEE Trans. Signal Process. Vol.53, No.10, pp.3749-3763, October 2005.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 95] [SCOPUS Times Cited 106]
 A. Farassopoulos, "Speech enhancement for hearing aids using adaptive beamformers", Proc. ICASSP-89, pp.1322-1325, May 1989.
 J. E. Greenberg, P. M. Zurek, "Evaluation of an adaptive beamforming method for hearing aids", J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., Vol.91, No.3, pp.1662-1676, March 1992.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Web of Science Times Cited 123] [SCOPUS Times Cited 145]
 J. V. Berghe, J. Wouters, "An adaptive noise canceller for hearing aids using two nearby microphones", J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., Vol.103, pp.3621-3626, June 1998.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Web of Science Times Cited 54] [SCOPUS Times Cited 65]
 A. Spriet, G. Rombouts, M. Moonen, J. Wouters, "Combined Feedback and noise suppression in hearing aids", IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Language Processing, Vol.15, No.6, pp.1777-1790, August 2007.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 6] [SCOPUS Times Cited 9]
 G. Rombouts, A. Spriet, M. Moonen, "Generalized sidelobe canceller based combined acoustic feedback and noise cancellation," ScienceDirect Signal Processing 88, pp.571-581, 2008.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 7] [SCOPUS Times Cited 8]
 A. Lombard, K. Reindl, and W. Kellermann, "Combination of adaptive feedback cancellation and binaural adaptive filtering in hearing aids," EURASIP Journal on advances in signal processing, Vol.2009, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 2] [SCOPUS Times Cited 8]
 M. G. Siqueira, A. Alwan, "Steady-state analysis of continuous adaptation in acoustic feedback reduction system for hearing-aids", IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Processing, Vol.8, No.4, pp.443-453, July 2000.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 85] [SCOPUS Times Cited 109]
Web of Science® Citations for all references: 648 TCR
SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 781 TCR
Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 43 ACR
SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 52 ACR
TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference
We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more
Citations for references updated on 2018-03-21 08:08 in 99 seconds.
Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics.
Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site.
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania
All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.
Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.
Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.